Thursday letter
January 2th 2020
- Pinocchio and the Great Conspiracy -
- Part 2 -
T
his is the second part of a series of two Thursday letters which is based on an interview with the Norwegian editor-in-chief of the independent Norwegian internet media Steigan.no Pål Steigan.
In the first part, I started with the story of Pinocchio being lured to Toyland where he is transformed into a donkey. Here, I looked at how the plans devised in the World Economic Forum were imperceptibly shed out in normal society through newspaper submissions and campaigns and how they emerged as legislative proposals in the legislative assemblies around the world and were adopted.
This time I will try to see if there is a connection between the plans based on the WEF and the horrors that take place within the childcare.
To illustrate this, I will start with my own case.
In 2013, I underwent a so-called parental ability assessment in connection with a concern about the well-being of my children. It is a long and rather intensive study that runs over several months.
To this day, I find this study to be the biggest breach of trust I have ever faced.
What I experienced was that this study turned everything around, digging and angling so that it could tell a story that I was an incompetent parent even though this was not true at all.
In the first part, I started with the story of Pinocchio being lured to Toyland where he is transformed into a donkey. Here, I looked at how the plans devised in the World Economic Forum were imperceptibly shed out in normal society through newspaper submissions and campaigns and how they emerged as legislative proposals in the legislative assemblies around the world and were adopted.
This time I will try to see if there is a connection between the plans based on the WEF and the horrors that take place within the childcare.
To illustrate this, I will start with my own case.
In 2013, I underwent a so-called parental ability assessment in connection with a concern about the well-being of my children. It is a long and rather intensive study that runs over several months.
To this day, I find this study to be the biggest breach of trust I have ever faced.
What I experienced was that this study turned everything around, digging and angling so that it could tell a story that I was an incompetent parent even though this was not true at all.
Instead of highlighting all the strengths that could be supported and built up, all the effort in the study was to break down, to blame for problems with me and to stress and degrade me and the children, in a subtle way where it was wrapped such as relevant and qualified studies.
This experience traumatized me, but it will also be the start of a study of the system.
I have grown up with the notion that society's safeguards are designed to bring people back to a situation as quickly as possible whereby they can cope with themselves and thus have better quality of life, but just as importantly did not unnecessarily strain the social coffers.
So a logic that everyone is interested in finding solutions to the problems.
Here I experienced the opposite. A social system that systematically created obstacles to solving the problems and that systematically tried to play family members off against each other and create divisions.
As I examine this, I become aware that everything in Denmark has been worked on the same family - and person-breaking principles.
During the course of my research, I saw Norway. There appeared to me a picture of Norway as the source of the destructive and destructive childcare.
I come on the trail of the theorist and journalist Kari Killén. It is her theories that define the approach used in childcare in both Norway, Denmark and Sweden.
When I became part of organizing the first international protest, it was therefore primarily a protest against the ideology of Norwegian childcare and the methods and the human view that we could see in the Norwegian childcare.
Methods such as Norway are actively trying to spread to other countries such as Bulgaria and Lithuania.
The motto of the protest is "Stop the Child Welfare Ideologist!"
This experience traumatized me, but it will also be the start of a study of the system.
I have grown up with the notion that society's safeguards are designed to bring people back to a situation as quickly as possible whereby they can cope with themselves and thus have better quality of life, but just as importantly did not unnecessarily strain the social coffers.
So a logic that everyone is interested in finding solutions to the problems.
Here I experienced the opposite. A social system that systematically created obstacles to solving the problems and that systematically tried to play family members off against each other and create divisions.
As I examine this, I become aware that everything in Denmark has been worked on the same family - and person-breaking principles.
During the course of my research, I saw Norway. There appeared to me a picture of Norway as the source of the destructive and destructive childcare.
I come on the trail of the theorist and journalist Kari Killén. It is her theories that define the approach used in childcare in both Norway, Denmark and Sweden.
When I became part of organizing the first international protest, it was therefore primarily a protest against the ideology of Norwegian childcare and the methods and the human view that we could see in the Norwegian childcare.
Methods such as Norway are actively trying to spread to other countries such as Bulgaria and Lithuania.
The motto of the protest is "Stop the Child Welfare Ideologist!"
During the preparations and especially in the months that follow, it became increasingly clear to us that it is not Norway from which this vicious approach is coming.
We, made reporters, about the systematic divisive and disruptive approach in the field of child care from countries such as England, Ireland, Switzerland, New Zealand and the inspiration for these countries' approach did not seem to come from Norway.
But if the evil approach did not come from Norway, where did it come from?
Could it come from the World Economic Forum?
With WEF we have a central body that brings together all the world's most influential politicians and business people. They meet every year and make plans and they take the plans home to their respective countries and translate them into law.
We have reasoned suspicion that WEF are not really interested in the well-being of the general public, but want a small power elite to have greater and greater power.
Could it be that these civil rights-breaking methods was actually introduced intentionally? Intentionally and with the purpose og spreading them out to the reset of the world. Could it be that Norway has just been particularly efficient when it comes applying them into there system?
In this blog post I will not be able to prove that this is the case, it would require much more thorough research than what I have the time, ability and opportunity to do in my current situation, but I would like to refer again to the interview from Steigan .no.
I will refer here a small part of the interview in writing.
The dialogue is between reporter Kari Angelique Jaquessont and editor-in-chief Pål Steigan.
Here is a link to the interview. The selected piece is 16:50 minute / second in.
We, made reporters, about the systematic divisive and disruptive approach in the field of child care from countries such as England, Ireland, Switzerland, New Zealand and the inspiration for these countries' approach did not seem to come from Norway.
But if the evil approach did not come from Norway, where did it come from?
Could it come from the World Economic Forum?
With WEF we have a central body that brings together all the world's most influential politicians and business people. They meet every year and make plans and they take the plans home to their respective countries and translate them into law.
We have reasoned suspicion that WEF are not really interested in the well-being of the general public, but want a small power elite to have greater and greater power.
Could it be that these civil rights-breaking methods was actually introduced intentionally? Intentionally and with the purpose og spreading them out to the reset of the world. Could it be that Norway has just been particularly efficient when it comes applying them into there system?
In this blog post I will not be able to prove that this is the case, it would require much more thorough research than what I have the time, ability and opportunity to do in my current situation, but I would like to refer again to the interview from Steigan .no.
I will refer here a small part of the interview in writing.
The dialogue is between reporter Kari Angelique Jaquessont and editor-in-chief Pål Steigan.
Here is a link to the interview. The selected piece is 16:50 minute / second in.
"Kari: But is citizen pay something negative .. tell. Many people seems to think that it is a brilliant idea.
Pål: Here you have the smallest assistance that allows you to sit at home and receive assistance and you have no job, you have no practice, you do not learn anything, you are an atom in this system .. you are quite... they are not really interested in you, but then you can be on this minimum salary. You get no fellowship, you have no union you have no colleagues you have no thing! You are just a recipient in the recipient flock and the same goes with cash.
Kari: Yes, let's talk about cash, but let's just go back to the last thing you said, that we are sitting there alone because there are a number of things that look like a kind of degradation of humanity, for example the dissolution of the family as institution, - the concept of mother and father, the national state. On all levels, there is an attempt to introduce policies and laws that make people stand more and more alone, thus disconnected from the institutions that are protecting us and that make us move in larger devices and thus have more power ..
Pål: Yes, Yes .. and all this you can read about on the World Economic Forum's website ie how they focus on "prideling" projects all over the world. How Joe Biden and Coca Cola have worked hard at this a few years ago and we have written about it. They have area by area that they take on as projects and then it emerges after a while as chroniclers and management articles and party programs around the world and the people in the local place seem to have come up with this themselves, but the work has been done interlectally by the billionaires and their people a long time ago. .. I have to say they are smart after all. "
If you can trust what Pål Steigan and Kari Angelique Jaquessont says here then there is pretty good reason to think that the family divisive and non-democratic methods in childcare in it's basic form derived from the billionaire's club; World Economic Forum and that they then take on slightly different forms in the local implementation.
It would make sense in relation to how the WEF works that they would strive to create polarization between the child's needs and the parents needs and then declare that they are in favor of supporting the child's needs rather than the parents needs.
It would make sense that the WEF would come up with a narrative that they want to protect children and use that narrative to further their real purpose of removing civil rights from citizens.
It is precisely the same method they have used in the area of terrorist legislation.
The threat of terror and the desire to safeguard against terror are used as a cover for a settlement of civil rights.
Although I am not able to present nail-proof evidence that the destructive methods in childcare are dictated by the WEF, I think that I have stated here that there is a high probability that they are.
Hereby I will stop for this time. This Thursday letter was supposed to be the second and last of a series of two.
However, the content and complexity have grown and I have therefore chosen to make another Thursday letter in this series. A Thursday letter where I return to look at the climate issue and WEF's plans for Global Redesign.
It would make sense in relation to how the WEF works that they would strive to create polarization between the child's needs and the parents needs and then declare that they are in favor of supporting the child's needs rather than the parents needs.
It would make sense that the WEF would come up with a narrative that they want to protect children and use that narrative to further their real purpose of removing civil rights from citizens.
It is precisely the same method they have used in the area of terrorist legislation.
The threat of terror and the desire to safeguard against terror are used as a cover for a settlement of civil rights.
Although I am not able to present nail-proof evidence that the destructive methods in childcare are dictated by the WEF, I think that I have stated here that there is a high probability that they are.
Hereby I will stop for this time. This Thursday letter was supposed to be the second and last of a series of two.
However, the content and complexity have grown and I have therefore chosen to make another Thursday letter in this series. A Thursday letter where I return to look at the climate issue and WEF's plans for Global Redesign.
Ingen kommentarer:
Send en kommentar